Chhotu Kumar Singh @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19186 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2018 Thana- BADHAILA District- Rohtas ====================================================== CHHOTU KUMAR SINGH @ CHHOTU KUMAR Son of Late Suresh Singh Resident of Village - Pachhar, P.S.- Badhaila, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Swetabh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-05-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Badhaila P.S.Case No.19 of 2018 dated 8.3.2018 registered for offences punishable under Section 307of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Prosecution story as per the written report is that the brother of the informant had gone in the marriage of daughter of Satyendra Singh and he received information that his brother has received gun shot injuries and he was taken to Jamuhar Medical College for treatment and where he saw that his brother has received gun shot injuries and from where he was referred to Varanasi Trauma Centre where he was treated. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19186 of 2019(4) dt.21-05-2019 2/2 that the whole allegation is false and concocted as a matter of fact the injured was in drunken condition and he received gun shot injury by himself , which has been fired by himself and there is no eye witness of the occurrence.

Heard learned A.P.P. , who has also considered this fact that in para 39 of the case diary it has also come that there was no record of the treatment of the brother of the informant at Jamuhar Medical College and theer is no eye witness of the occurrence and the petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2018.. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Judge IX cum ACJM, Sasaram/Transferee court in connection with Badhaila P.S.Case No.19 of 2018 dated 8.3.2018.

With the above direction, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T