← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56185/2017bail granted

Ram Kripal Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-23Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56185 of 2017 Arising out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2017 ThanaGOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhubani ===============================================

1. Ram Kripal Yadav, Son of Ram Lal Yadav, Resident of VillageKhairamath, P.S.-Jainagar, District-Madhubani.

2. Prem Chandra Kamat, Son of Dhani Ram Kamat, Resident of Village-Shailanath, P.S.-Jainagar, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s =============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP. =============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 82.50 litres of Nepali Soufi Wine was recovered from the two jute bags kept on a motorcycle which was being boarded by the petitioners. It is urged that the petitioners have remained in custody since 02.09.2017, i.e., for about more than two and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56185 of 2017(2) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 half months. It is claimed that the petitioners are having clean antecedent.

Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with G.O. Case No. 288 of 2017 with a condition that if the petitioners, after their release in this case, are again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Vikash/- U T