Patna High CourtCWJC/6250/2016disposed

Bibi Sabina Khatoon @ Sabina Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-28Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.6250 of 2016 dt.28-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6250 of 2016 =========================================================== Bibi Sabina Khatoon @ Sabina Khatoon, Wife of Nasar Alam, Resident of Village Joginder Gram Panchayat Bhansiya P.S. Mahalgaon (Jokihat) District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate Araria, district- Araria.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer Araria, District- Araria.

4. The District Supply Officer Araria, District- Araria.

5. The Block Supply Officer, Araria, District- Araria. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Santosh Kr.Jha, GP-3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs - "(i) For quashing the order of District Magistrate, Araria in Appeal NO. 04 of 2015-2016 dated 05.02.2016 (Annexure-1) by which District Magistrate, Araria dismissed the appeal of the petitioner without Judicial Brain which is illegal malafide and fit to be set aside and said District magistrate confirm the cancellation of the PDS license dated 24.03.2015. (ii) For the confirming order dated 24.03.2015 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Araria contained in 5J/13 (Annexure-2) whereby and whereunder Sub-Divisional Officer, Araria cancelled the license of the petitioner without proper inquiry on the ground of vague allegation by opponent party.

(iii) For holding Annexure-1 and 2 dated 05.02.2016 and

Patna High Court CWJC No.6250 of 2016 dt.28-06-2018 24.03.2015 passed by District magistrate, Araria and SubDivisional Officer, Araria are illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.

(iv) For any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled in the eye of law."

3. At the very outset, this Court takes note that remedy by way of revision before the Divisional Commissioner is available to the petitioner against the impugned order dated 05.02.2016 passed in Appeal No. 04 of 2015-2016, which has not been availed of by the petitioner.

4. In view of availability of the alternative remedy as above, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a revision petition before the Divisional Commissioner for redressal of her grievances.

5. It is made clear that in case such a revision petition is filed, the concerned authority would have regard to the present proceeding being pursued by the petitioner, while considering any issue relating to condonation of delay, if applicable. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 02.07.2018 Transmission Date N.A.