Alka Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7126 of 2016 =========================================================== Alka Kumari Wife of Munna Kumar Resident of village - Satjora, P.S. Panapur, District - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar null null

2. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate - Cum - Collector, Saran, Chapra

3. The District Welfare Officer, Saran, Chapra

4. The Child Development Project officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Saran, Chapra

5. The Block Development officer, Panapur, Saran Chapra

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Satjora Block, Panapur, District - Saran, Chapra

7. The Deputy Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Saran, Chapra

8. Rekha Devi Wife of Sri Sudhir Kumar Singh Resident of village - Satjora, P.S. Panapur, District - Saran .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to GP-24 For Respondent No.8 : Mrs. Jyotsna Rani Mishra, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-07-2018 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel to G.P.24 and Mrs. Jyotsna Rani Mishra, learned counsel for the private respondent.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30.10.2015 passed by the District Programme Officer whereby her objection on the disability claimed by the private respondent for appointment as an Anganbari Sevika at Centre No.12, Gram Panchayat Satjora, Block- Panapur in the district of Saran has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.7126 of 2016 dt.02-07-2018 2/2 rejected and the appointment upheld. A copy of the order is impugned at Annexure-4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

Two issues does not persuade this Court to grant indulgence to the prayer made namely:

(a) the petitioner has failed to exhaust statutory appellate remedy that was available to her under the guidelines in force; and (b) the objection raised by the petitioner on the disability claimed by the private respondent, was examined by the District Programme Officer, who has upheld the disability certificate issued in favour of the private respondent.

The objection of the petitioner having been discussed and enquired by the District Programme Officer and who has upheld the disability certificate, I find no reason to interfere with the finding of fact recorded by him after enquiry.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) N.H./- Ranveer AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date04-07-2018