Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28580 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2020 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Ravi Kumar S/O Ujjawal Rai R/O Village- Mahua Bagh, P.S-Rupaspur, District-Patna.
2.
Ranjan Kumar S/O Ujjawal Rai R/O Village- Mahua Bagh, P.S-Rupaspur, District-Patna.
3.
Gautam Kumar S/O Ujjawal Rai R/O Village- Mahua Bagh, P.S-Rupaspur, District-Patna.
4.
Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Yadav S/O Maksudan Singh R/O VillageMahua Bagh, P.S-Rupaspur, District-Patna. 5.
Yogendra Rai @ Yogendra Prasad S/O Ramdeo Rai R/O Village- Mahua Bagh, P.S-Rupaspur, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.143 of 2020 registered for offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504, 447, 506, 379, 307 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28580 of 2021(2) dt.22-03-2022 2/3 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1, namely, Ravi Kumar has been arrested during the pendency of this application. Hence, he prays for withdrawal of the application.
Prayer is allowed. The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner no. 1, namely, Ravi Kumar is concerned.
So far as petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, namely, Ranjan Kumar, Gautam Kumar, Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Yadav and Yogendra Rai @ Yogendra Prasad are concerned, it is submitted that because of the land dispute, this occurrence has taken place and injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature.
Considering the aforesaid facts, this application on behalf of petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, namely, Ranjan Kumar, Gautam Kumar, Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Yadav and Yogendra Rai @ Yogendra Prasad is allowed.
Accordingly, let petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, namely, Ranjan Kumar, Gautam Kumar, Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Yadav and Yogendra Rai @ Yogendra Prasad, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28580 of 2021(2) dt.22-03-2022 3/3 ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,- II, Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.143 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T