← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/846/2016disposed

Devendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-14Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.846 of 2016 dt.14-08-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.846 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Devendra Kumar son of Late Bajrangi Sharma, resident of Mohalla- Krishnapuri Colony, Jehanabad, Police Station and District- Jehanabad as present working on the post of Panchayat Secretary at Ghoshi Block, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate Jehanabad

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Executive Officer, Jehanabad

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jehanabad.

5. The Child Development Project Officer, Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad.

6. The Anchal Adhikari Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad.

7. The Block Development Officer, Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, G.P.18 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-08-2018 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the State. Perused the records.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Block Development Officer, Ghoshi bearing memo No.1254 dated 23.12.2015 whereby he has been directed to return the amounts advanced to him for construction of Anganbari Centers together with interest.

Mr. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner invites the attention of this Court to the reply filed by the petitioner at Annexure-8 before

Patna High Court CWJC No.846 of 2016 dt.14-08-2018 the Block Development Officer, Ghoshi and to submit that the constructions have been carried out at the place in question under the Schemes in question and which requires to be accounted for before a decision is taken as to return of the amounts advanced. Having heard Mr. Roy and considering the detailed representation of the petitioner filed in response to the direction of the Block Development Officer, Ghoshi impugned at Annexure-1, I deem it proper to direct the Block Development Officer, Ghoshi to consider the representation of the petitioner enclosed at Annexure-8 and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of 3 months on receipt production of a copy of the order. The writ petition is allowed with the direction aforementioned. (Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date22.08.2018 Transmission Date NA