← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21172/2024disposed

Raju Kumar @ Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju Yadav @ Raju Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-26Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21172 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2017 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Raju Kumar @ Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju Yadav @ Raju Singh Yadav Son Of Shiv Mangal Yadav Village -RAHATHUA Ps- Brahmpur District -BUXAR ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. on behalf of the State.

The instant application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 52 of 2017 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

Earlier the application for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 19.09.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32046 of 2023 with an observation to learned trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21172 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 In pursuance to the direction of this Court, a report, dated 19.03.2024, with regard to present stage of trial has been received and the same is kept at flag 'R'. From its perusal it appears that the trial is likely to be concluded within six months.

No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for grant of regular bail is rejected.

Accordingly, petition stands disposed off.

However, learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial within stipulated period ie. 6 months., failing which, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T