Neeraj Kumar @ Baru @ Badu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55855 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2015 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar @ Baru @ Badu, Son of Sitaram Yadav, resident of VillageBelthu Tola, Gulriya Chak, P.S.- Magadh Medical, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SIR PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEY ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected thrice vide order dated 11.07.2016, 15.03.2017 and 02.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21921 of 2016, 10439 of 2017 and 33627 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2015. Up-till now the trial has not been concluded though there was direction to conclude the same within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order. Only one prosecution witness has been examined who is the I.O. and as such in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55855 of 2017(2) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of custody and further that in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge Icum-Special Judge, Gaya in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 148 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T