Ram Chandra Bind v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.61227 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -177 Year- 2017 Thana -RAHUI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Ram Chandra Bind, Son of Late Nakat Jamadar, resident of Village: Beldariya Par, P.S: Rahui, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deo Raj Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rahui P.S.Case No.177 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is said to be father-in-law of the deceased and the case is of the dowry death.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she died due to hanging and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be father-in-law. He is in custody for about seven months and there is no specific allegation against him.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61227 of 2017 (3) dt.12-01-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui P.S.Case No.177 of 2017 (G.R.No.2629 of 2017).
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T