Ram Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17542 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1008 Year-2018 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== RAM BABU RAI Son of Late Ram Janam Rai Resident of Village - Garipatti, P.S.- Sonpur, District - Saran, at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307,504, 348, 379/34 IPC registered in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 1008 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the petitioner is said to be merely an order giver and there is no accusation of assault against him. There is case and counter case between the parties in the backdrop of land dispute. The petitioner is a man of advanced age of about 75 years and claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM Ist, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 1008 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17542 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T