Satyam Raj @ Aman Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20884 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2023 Thana- PUNAURA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Satyam Raj @ Aman Singh Son Of Nirnay Singh Resident Of Village - Narsama, P.S. - Riga, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Punaura P.S. Case No. 32 of 2023, registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 353, 188, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, a motorcycle rider lost his life when an uncontrolled truck stepped over him. When the police party reached there, the FIR named co-accused persons along with 500 persons attacked the police party and they tried to snatch the weapon of the informant and also tried to set them on fire by sprinkling petrol. The name of the petitioner transpired during investigation for being involved

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20884 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/3 in the occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR though 7 persons have been named apart from 500 unknown persons. The named co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned trial court but the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected on account of his criminal antecedent. There is general and omnibus allegation against the named and not named coaccused persons. There is no injury on any of the personnel of the police party. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases but he is on bail in all such cases.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the remoteness of allegation which is quite general and vague and also considering the possibility of false implication, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20884 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 3/3 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi/court concerned in connection with Punaura P.S. Case No. 32 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) balmukund/- U T