Patna High CourtCWJC/20760/2012disposed

Srikanta Kumar Mishra v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-01-29Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20760 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Srikanta Kumar Mishra S/O Sri Sadasiba Mishra R/O At- Sreenibas, P.O.- Puri, District- Puri, P.S.- Kumbharapala (Orissa) At Present C/O Narayan Jha, 97/2 Mitra Mandal Colony, P.S.- Phulwari, P.O.- Anisabad, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union Of India Through The Managing Director Bharat Wagon & Engg. Co. Ltd., Ministry Of Railway, New Delhi

2. The Managing Director Bharat Wagon & Engineering Company Limited Reg. & Head Office, 'C' Block, 5th Floor, Maurya Lok Complex, Dak Banglow Road,Patna-800001

3. The Chief Manager, Personnal & Administration Bharat Wagon & Engineering Company Ltd., Maurya Lok Complex, Dak Bunglow Road, Patna-800001

4. The Dy. General Manager, Bharat Wagon & Engineering Company Ltd. Mokama Unit, Mokama, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Bose, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2015 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Bharat Wagon & Engineering Company Ltd.

To-day, a supplementary counter affidavit has been filed wherein letter dated 27th January 2015 has been tagged from which it appears that the petitioner has been confirmed in service with effect from 1st April 2014, provided the petitioner would accept the terms and conditions mentioned therein. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he accepts the letter in toto and also submits that if the petitioner has any

Patna High Court CWJC No.20760 of 2012 (12) dt.29-01-2015 2/2 grievance, he may be given liberty to represent before the authority concerned.

It goes without saying that the petitioner has always liberty to raise his grievance and the authority will be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.

Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U