← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18812/2017dismissed

Pankaj Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2018-01-11Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18812 of 2017 =========================================================== Pankaj Kumar S/o Sri Deep Narayan Rajak At - Purani Bazar, Ward No. - 4, District - Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle Patna.

2. The Postmaster General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur.

3. The Asstt. Director - III, O/o the Postmaster General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Superintendent of Post Office, Saharsa Division, Saharsa.

5. The Asstt. Superintendent of Post Office, Madhepura Sub Division, Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar Karan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay (Addl. S. G.) Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, A.S.G.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 11-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India. The core issue is that the so called certificate akin to matriculation obtained by this petitioner from the Board of Higher Secondary Education, New Delhi (a fake organization) can form the basis for begetting employment in the Postal Department. Since this is not an educational institution but a fraudulent organization selling

Patna High Court CWJC No.18812 of 2017 dt.11-01-2018 2/2 fake certificates, therefore, if this fact is not disputed and the educational qualification of the present petitioner is not a matter of argument then any employment obtained by him on the basis of the said certificate cannot beget him the benefit of continuance in service. The Court will advise the petitioner to acquire knowledge instead of buying knowledge from such institutions.

No interference is warranted with the order of the Tribunal. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/Devendra AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date15.01.2018 Transmission Date NA