Sahebjan @ Sahebjan Miya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17693 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-691 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Sahebjan @ Sahebjan Miya Son of Late Madin Miya @ Mohammadin Resident of Village- Olhanpur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amir Alam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Exclusives Substance Act and Section 288 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and as per prosecution story, it is alleged that police got information that Aurangjeb and Irfan are illegally manufacturing fire crackers without any licence and there was an explosion causing injury, further Aurangzeb took his family members to an undisclosed location, further considering the election, the police was deployed at the place of occurrence but subsequently it came to the notice of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17693 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/3 police that Shamshad Ali is having illegal fire crackers in his house, accordingly, the place was raided and large quantity of illegal fire crackers was seized.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being father of Aurangzeb and Irfan. It is next submitted that petitioner was completely unaware what kind of business his sons were running. It is also submitted that petitioner has no concern or relation with Shamshad Ali. It is further submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhaura P.S. Case No.691/2025, subject to the conditions

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17693 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 3/3 as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T