Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21917/2026bail rejected

Pintu Kumar @ Harsh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21917 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2026 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Pintu Kumar @ Harsh Son of Chandradeo Yadav R/o Village - Immamganj, P.S. - Obra, Dist. - Aurangabad(Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No.13 of 2026 lodged on 07.01.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 pending before the Court of C.J.M., Aurangabad.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against five named accused persons including the petitioner with allegation that they have stolen one Black color Scorpio which does not carry any number plate in the front side rather back side of the vehicle.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21917 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner has not stolen the said vehicle and he is not involved in this crime in any manner.

5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there are two criminal cases pending against him.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and allegation is also made against him.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order on merit without being prejudice of the present order .

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T