Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21029 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2024 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Yadav S/o- Surendra Yadav @ Suro @ Surendra Mohan Shishir R/v- Malhipur Ps- Hasanpur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 110 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 401, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8(C), 21(B), 21(C), 22(C) of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of the petitioner altogether 10 grams of brown sugar was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21029 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 2/2 case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.05.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 110 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T