Md. Jisan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19360 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-779 Year-2021 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

MD. JISAN S/o Md. Ladle R/o village- East Noon Gola, Hajipur, P.S.- Town Hajipur, District- Vaishali 2.

MD. SONU S/o Md. Ladle R/o village- East Noon Gola, Hajipur, P.S.- Town Hajipur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. H.A. Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Town Hajipur P.S. Case No.779 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 341, 323, 379, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and her son. The accused persons also snatched the earring and chain from the informant. It is also alleged that when the daughter of the informant goes to coaching, the accused persons tease her.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19360 of 2022(3) dt.05-09-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the occurrence took place on 27.09.2021 and the FIR was lodged on 02.10.2021.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submitted that the allegation is of teasing the daughter of the informant while she goes to coaching. The accused persons also threaten to throw acid.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T