Praveen Soni @ Parbinda v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30610 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-544 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Praveen Soni @ Parbinda, aged about 35 years, male, S/o Late Asharfi Sah R/o village- Haibatur Koriya, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Kumari Anupam, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor (for short 'APP') for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour her undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioner seeks bail in Begusarai Muffasil P. S. Case No. 544 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 386, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, this Court had called for a report regarding the current stage of trial from the learned Trial Court. In compliance of this Court's order, report dated 10-022022 has been received from the learned Trial Court, which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30610 of 2021(5) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 states that charge has not been framed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she is also aware of this fact. Earlier, the petitioner's prayer for bail was rejected by this Court on 25-11-2020 (Annexure-1) after due consideration of the matter on merits as there is direct allegation of collecting 'Rangdari' from the informant and portion of the alleged amount of 'Rangdari' was seized from the petitioner as also having regard to his criminal antecedents, the Court, for the present, is not inclined to take a different view. However, after framing of charge, it is submitted by the petitioner's counsel that she would be making an attempt for bail. This Court would only observe that any proposed application may only be considered when filed. This application is rejected.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U T