← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16800/2016disposed

Rakesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-17Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16800 of 2016 ====================================================== Rakesh Ranjan Son of Dinesh Prasad Gupta Resident of Village- Shikarganj, P.S. Chiraiya (Shikarganj), District East Champaran Proprietor of M/s Ayush Rice Mill, Shikarganj, P.S. Chiraiya (Shikarganj) District East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar , through the Principal Secretary, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Department , Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.

3. The District Manager Bihar state Food and Civil Supply, Corporation Ltd, Motihari, District East Champaran.

4. The District Certificate Officer, Certificate Department East Champaran at Motihari.

5. The District Supply Officer, District East Champaran at Motihari.

6. The Officer-in-Charge, Chakia Police Station-District East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Namrata Mishra,GA-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 12.08.2016 passed in Certificate Case No. 38/Khadyan 14-15 by the Certificate Officer, East Champaran at Motihari.

The learned counsel for the respondents referring to the counter affidavit has submitted that after the petitioner had filed the objection, the learned Certificate Officer has rejected the same by an order dated 22.04.2016 and has directed the petitioner to deposit the certificate amount. It is further submitted that the aforesaid order passed by the Certificate

Patna High Court CWJC No.16800 of 2016(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 Officer is amenable to appeal and the petitioner can take recourse to the remedy of appeal by filing an appeal under Section 60 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the final order passed by the Certificate Officer, Motihari, East Champaran and in case an appeal is filed within four weeks from today, no coercive steps shall be taken till the disposal of the appeal.

It is needless to state that for a period of four weeks from today, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner herein and during the said period the petitioner would be at liberty to file the requisite appeal.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U