Jim Dar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16788 of 2014 ====================================================== Jim Dar Yadav S/o Late Lakshmi Yadav Resident of Village Ardhawa, P.O. Kamalpur, P.S. Basopatti, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Family and Social Welfare, Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

3.

The District Welfare Officer, Madhubani.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Block Child Development Project Officer, Basopatti, Madhubani. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Basopatti, Madhubani. 7.

Sunita Devi W/o Ram Kumar Yadav Resident of Village Arghawa, P.O. Kamalpur, P.S. Basopatti, District Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, AC to GA - 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2021 Heard Mr. Ratnakar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, learned AC to GA -13 for the State through video conferencing.

The present writ application has been filed for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order passed by Child Development Project Officer, Basopatti whereby private respondent has been appointed as Anganwadi Sewika for Anganwadi Sewika Centre No. 55 , Turha Tola, Purwari village situated in Panchayat Raj Arghawa within Basopatti P.S. in the District Madhubani.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16788 of 2014(2) dt.12-07-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to prefer appeal before the appellate authority i.e. District Magistrate, Madhubani. Learned counsel for the State has got no objection. In view of the submission as aforesaid, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to prefer appeal before the appellate authority i.e. District Magistrate Madhubani within a period of one month from today.

It is made clear that if appeal is filed within 30 days from today along with petition for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall consider the same in accordance with law.

Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U