Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2319 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2021 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
VIKASH SINGH @ VIKASH KUMAR SINGH Son of Raj Kishore Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran.
2.
Raj Kishore Singh Son of Late Baban Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 3.
Mridang Singh Son of Late Baban Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 4.
Jitendra Singh Son of Mridang Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 5.
Bittu Singh Son of Mridang Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 6.
Rohit Singh Son of Jitendra Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 7.
Tapan Singh Son of Late Laxman Singh Resident of Village - Dumaria, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 8.
Udai Singh Son of Tapan Singh Resident of Village - Dumaria, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. 9.
Abhay Singh Son of Tapan Singh Resident of Village - Dumaria, Police Station - Dumariaghat, District - East Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-11-2021 Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants has
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2319 of 2021(2) dt.02-11-2021 2/2 submitted that during the pendency of this appeal, the appellants have been arrested. As such, the appeal has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the counsel for the appellants within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T