Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56850/2017bail granted

Punnu @ Keshav Singh @ Punnu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56850 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -301 Year- 2016 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Punnu @ Keshav Singh @ Punnu Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Jitendra Singh, resident of Village Katra, P.S. Katra, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 24.04.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 14974 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 28.05.2016 and liberty was given to renew his prayer for bail after remaining six months more in custody by order dated 27.04.2017 and the petitioner has remained in custody further more than six months.

The learned A.P.P. in view of the observation does not oppose the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56850 of 2017 (2) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge IXth, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 111 of 2017 arising out of Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 301 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T