Patna High CourtCR. REV./802/2014dismissed

Adalat Choudhary @ Adalat Sahni v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-02-07Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.802 of 2014 =========================================================== Adalat Choudhary @ Adalat Sahni, S/o Sri Banshi Sahni, Resident of Village Majharia, P.O. Majharia Shaikh, P.S. Majhaulia, District West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Raju Choudhary, S/o Sri Suresh Choudhary, Resident of Village Madhopur, P.S. Majhaulia, District West Champaran.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT & ORDER Date: 07-02-2017 Heard the parties.

2. Perused the judgment and order, dated 29.08.2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah in Cr. Revision No. 57 of 2014, whereby, he has set-aside the order of cognizance, dated 05.03.2014, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, West Champaran, Bettiah, in Complaint Case No. 2011 of 2013. The said judgment and order is being assailed in the present application, preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the petitioner, who is the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.802 of 2014 dt.07-02-2017 2/2 complainant of the said Complaint Case No. 2011 of 2013.

3. It appears from the material on record and the case of the prosecution as disclosed in the complaint petition that there was some internal dispute over election of Majhaulia Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samit Ltd., Majhaulia. It is the case of the petitioner that in one of the meetings, he had not attended, but opposite party No. 2 entered his false signature, showing his presence in the said meeting.

4. Considering the nature of dispute leading to registration of the First Information Report, I am of the view that no interference with the judgment and order of the court below is required.

5. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 08.02.2017 Transmission Date 08.02.2017