Laddu Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1095 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Laddu Singh, son of Jaymangal Singh @ Mangal Singh, resident of Village- Thakurjee Kachahari Tola, Kadwa, Police Station- Dholbajja, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Simpul Kumari, wife of Laddu Singh, daughter of Sri Shivnandan Singh, resident of Village- Thakurjee Kachahari Tola, Kadwa, Police StationDholbajja, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 498A, 323, 468, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D.P. Act but cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D.P. Act. The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2017. The petitioner has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1095 of 2018 (2) dt.08-01-2018 2/2 got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Naugachia, Bhagalpur, in connection with Complaint case No.68 of 2015.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T