← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19935/2026bail rejected

Prakash Kumar @ Munna Kumar @ Munna v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19935 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Prakash Kumar @ Munna Kumar @ Munna son of Arun Singh RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -FULSETHAR, PS- KURTHA, DISTRICT- ARWAL ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ramakant Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 and 303(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on the head of informant with iron rod.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are covillagers and on account of petty dispute, altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19935 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that this petitioner assaulted on the head of informant with iron rod. Doctor has found the injuries, caused by the petitioner, grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T