Aniket Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20329 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2017 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== ANIKET KUMAR SINGH Son of Ramkaran Singh Resident of Village - Bihat Sundarvan Tola, Ward no.17, P.s.- Bdarauni (F.C.I. OP), Distt.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 420, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 3179.88 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20329 of 2022(2) dt.13-05-2022 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 3179.88 liters wine is recovered from truck. The truck in question does not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the truck in question was parked by the side of the premises of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Excise

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20329 of 2022(2) dt.13-05-2022 3/3 Judge-I, Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 502 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T