Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25816/2026dismissed

Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Prasad @ Satyendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25816 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2024 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Prasad @ Satyendra Kumar Son of Yogendra Prasad RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -CHUNUKPUR, PO- BANDHUGANJ, PS- GHOSHI, DISTRICT -JEHANABAD, BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. This is the second attempt of bail of the petitioner. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35184 of 2025.

4. The petitioner is named in the FIR. There is specific allegation against him of inflicting firearm injury in abdomen of the deceased who died during course of the treatement.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25816 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the I.O. and the doctor are not been examined for the last one year and because of that the trial has been delayed. The petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2024.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the fact that the trial is on the verge of conclusion, this application is dismissed.

8. The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad is directed to ensure the attendance of the two witnesses within next one month and file a compliance report.

9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T