Ravin Kumar @ Rabin Sahni @ Ravi Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21474 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2018 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

RAVIN KUMAR @ RABIN SAHNI @ RAVI SAHNI Son of Dilip Sahni Resident of Village - Sekhatola Ekmba, P.S.- Khodawantpur (Chaurahi O.p.), Distt.- Begusarai.

2.

Ajay Sahni @ Ajay Kumar Son of Dilip Sahni Resident of Village - Sekhatola Ekmba, P.S.- Khodawantpur (Chaurahi O.p.), Distt.- Begusarai. 3.

Bipin Sahni @ Bipin Kumar Son of Dilip Sahni Resident of Village - Sekhatola Ekmba, P.S.- Khodawantpur (Chaurahi O.p.), Distt.- Begusarai. 4.

Vijay Sahni Son of Dilip Sahni Resident of Village - Sekhatola Ekmba, P.S.- Khodawantpur (Chaurahi O.p.), Distt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-07-2019 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP for the State is present.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Khodawandpur (Chaurahi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 174 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 195(A), 504, 506, 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution report, on 03.08.2018 all the accused persons named in the FIR forcibly entered in the house of the informant armed with various weapons and asked him to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21474 of 2019(3) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 withdraw the case bearing no. 191 of 2013. They also assaulted the daughter, wife and son of the informant and kidnapped the daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned APP for the State that till date the victim girl has not come back and the petitioner is not co-operating with the investigation.

Learned APP read out the materials collected in the case diary and has submitted that there are witness who have supported the prosecution story.

In the given facts and circumstance of the case where this petitioner is named in the FIR and there is allegation that he had taken away the victim girl who has yet not returned, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T