Sanjeet Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1079 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.133 of 2019 ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar, son of Raj Kishore Chaudhary, resident of Village-Kudhani, P.S.-Kudhani, District-Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur namely Mr. Pranav Kumar.
2.
Mr. Pranav Kumar, The District Magistrate cum Collector, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 3.
Mr. Madhu Kant, The Deputy Collector Land Reform, West, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur.
4.
Mr. Anil Kumar Das, The Sub Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur.
5.
Mr. Rambhu Thakur, The Circle Officer, Kudhani, District-Muzaffarpur. 6.
Mr. Arbind Kumar, Officer in charge, Kudhani Police Station, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 7.
Naveen Kumar @ Pappu, son of Late Vibhuti Prasad, resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.-Kudhani, District-Muzaffarpur.
8.
Rajeev Kumar, son of Indradeo Prasad @ Tuntun Prasad, resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.-Kudhani, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate Mr.Rajiva Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 11-07-2023 In the present petition, petitioner has prayed for noncompliance of the orders of this Court dated 07.01.2020. In this regard, the petitioner is stated to have submitted representation on 23.01.2020 and 08.02.2021, before submission of
Patna High Court MJC No.1079 of 2021(4) dt.11-07-2023 2/2 representation, the concerned respondent has proceeded to resolve the petitioner's claim on 18.05.2020. However, the same has not been communicated in the forum known to the law like passing speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner so as to enable him to question the validity of such decision in the event of non-satisfaction of petitioner's claim. Therefore, the concerned respondent is hereby directed to pass a speaking order with reference to 18.05.2020 decision to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order.
2. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Jitendra Kumar, J) abhishekkr/- U