Arun Kumar Singh, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8839 of 2021 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Singh, son of Lalbahadur Singh, Resident of Village-Jalaibar, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, District-Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary of Home Department, BIhar at Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua.

3.

The Zonal Manager of Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Patna, District-Patna. 4.

The Area Manager of Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, P.S.-Bhabua, Brahmchari Katara, District-Kaimur at Bhabua. 5.

The Branch Manager of Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank Bhagwanpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, P.O.-Bhagwanpur, District-Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 19-01-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "For issuance of a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature certiorari to quash the possession Notice dated 28.01.2020 issued by the Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank for realization of the amount of rupees 521835/- and interest thereon and for issuance a writ order or direction in the nature or mandamus commanding to the respondents to not issued any coercive action against the petitioner while the petitioner is ready

Patna High Court CWJC No.8839 of 2021(3) dt.19-01-2022 2/2 to deposit the sanctioned loan amount in the installments of the rest principle amount and/or pass and other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under circumstances of the case and/or may be pass other and further order which the petitioner is entitled to."

On 03.01.2022, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, despite repeated calls and pass over, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the respondents is present.

The petition is dismissed for default.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/DKS/- U