Bimlesh Yadav @ Vindesh Yadav @ Vimlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20650 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2021 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Bimlesh Yadav @ Vindesh Yadav @ Vimlesh Yadav Son Of Chandra Dev Yadav @ Chandra Deo Yadav R/O Village- Gadhiyani (KAMLAWARI), P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 01 of 2021 dated 03.01.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that the instant matter relates to the recovery of 448.800 litres of country made nepali liquor and the same is stated to have been recovered from a tempo and the petitioner is registered owner of the said vehicle, on account of which, he has been made accused in this case, in fact on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20650 of 2023(2) dt.10-05-2023 2/2 alleged day of recovery, one namely Sudhir Kumar Sahni had taken the petitioner's tempo from petitioner's wife for some essential purpose but the said Sudhir Kumar Sahni misused the petitioner's vehicle in committing the alleged crime. Further submissions are that the petitioner has fair and clean antecedent and has been languishing in jail since 05.02.2023 and against him, the investigation has been completed.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the bail prayer of the petitioner.

5. Considering the above submissions and mainly the petitioner's fair and clean antecedent and completion of the investigation against him, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 01 of 2021.

(Shailendra Singh, J) annu/- U T