Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29291 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2020 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

SUSHILA DEVI Wife of Birendra Ram Resident of Village- Islampur, P.S.- Kargahra, District- Rohtas.

2.

Birendra Ram Son of Dayal Ram Resident of Village- Islampur, P.S.- Kargahra, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfilment of a motorcycle and deceased, namely, Seema Kumari died It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29291 of 2021(2) dt.08-02-2022 2/2 that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that for the death of the deceased the husband is namely, Manish Kumar. He further submits that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody and petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased respectively and they have no concern with the mess and business from the husband of the deceased, namely, Manish Kumar. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Kargahra P.S. Case No. 310 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T