Subhash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19570 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2024 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Subhash Singh S/O Late Prethwee Lal Singh R/O Village -Giddha,P.SSankarpur, Dist- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pratibha Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 17 of 2025, arising out of Raghopur P.S. Case No. 334 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, on secret information, the police raided the place of occurrence and arrested five accused persons including the petitioner. It is further alleged that one black stick fitted with chuura has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19570 of 2025(2) dt.09-04-2025 2/2 present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. It is further submitted that no firearm has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with S.T. No. 17 of 2025, arising out of Raghopur P.S. Case No. 334 of 2024. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T