Shatrughan Yadav @ Shatrudhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52563 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2018 Thana -BAKHTIARPUR District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Shatrughan Yadav @ Shatrudhan Yadav Son of Sri Suresh Yadav Resident of Village- Simri Tola Dhab P.S. Simribakhtiyarpur DistrictSaharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2018 in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is that he has taken the son of the informant along with him and forcibly got him married with a girl.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact that there was love affair between the son of the informant and the girl and he has married with his own will. Further submission is that charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody for about five months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and considering the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52563 of 2018 (2) dt.05-10-2018 2/2 aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-III at Saharsa, in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T