Md. Meraz Rashid @ Meraz @ Md. Meraj Rasid @ Miraj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.59060 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -389 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANI HAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== MD. MERAZ RASHID @ MERAZ @ MD. MERAJ RASID @ MIRAJ, S/o Md. Harun Rasid, R/o Muhalla- Muzaffar Ahmad Nagar, Madhopara, P.S.- K.Hat Sahayak, District- Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshnand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 09.08.2017 in connection with K. Hat Sahayak P.S. Case No.389 of 2017, G.R. No.2074 of 2017, registered for the offence under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., but his name has surfaced on the confessional statement made before the police by a coaccused, which has no evidentiary value. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that no specific act is attributed against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59060 of 2017 (2) dt.14-12-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with K. Hat Sahayak P.S. Case No.389 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:
(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T