← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11247/2015disposed

Gulam Gaush v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11247 of 2015 ====================================================== Gulam Gaush, Son of Md. Fhakhruddin Ali, resident of village- Ijharchak, P.S. Narhat Gram Panchayat Narhat, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Primary Education, Bihar Patna. null null

2. The Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Education Officer, Nawada.

4. The Collector, Nawada.

5. The District Education Officer, Nawada.

6. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Nawada.

7. The Block Development Officer, Narhat, District- Nawada.

8. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Narhat, District- Nawada.

9. The Secretary Gram Panchayat Narhat, District- Nawada.

10. Md. Imamal Ishdaur, Son of Jiyaul Haque, resident of village- Nemdarganj, P.S. Akbarpur, District- Nawada.

11. Md. Sajit, Son of Md. Abrar, resident of village- Roh, P.S. Roh, DistrictNawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma, Adv.

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Suresh Kumar, AC to GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 20-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to approach the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Nawada. In case, such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today alongwith a copy of this order, the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Nawada

Patna High Court CWJC No.11247 of 2015(2) dt.20-12-2018 2/2 is required to decide the appeal in accordance with law on its own merit after condoning the delay, if any, in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the remedy before this Court.

With the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U