Ramashray Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33487 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2015 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Ramashray Singh, son of Sri Dharmdeo Singh, Proprietor of M/s Surya Mini Rice Mill, Resident of Village- Pipari, P.S.- Sheosagar, DistrictRohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation, Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Sufiyan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being a rice miller is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that Rohtas unit of Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. supplied 4682.80 quintals of paddy to the petitioner being rice miller under an agreement during the agricultural years 2011-12 in lieu thereof the petitioner was supposed to supply 3137.48 quintals of custom milled rice. The petitioner supplied only 798.21 quintals of processed rice but failed to supply 2339.27 quintals of processed
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33487 of 2015 (2) dt.13-08-2015 2/3 rice worth Rs.44,51,953.94/-.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the rice could not be supplied due to supply of poor quality of paddy and the apathetic attitude of the officials of The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Moreover, under agreement the due amount was supposed to be realized by initiating certificate proceeding under the provision of Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 or through arbitration. It is further submitted that the certificate case has been quashed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the BSFC that the petitioner failed to make supply within stipulated time frame and appeal is pending against the quashing of certificate proceeding. However, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will deposit 20% of the alleged due amount through bank draft in favour of Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. within six months.
Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for seven months in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM Ist
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33487 of 2015 (2) dt.13-08-2015 3/3 Class, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 64 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid deposit will not be treated to be an admission of the petitioner with regard to the claim of the informant but the same will be subject to the certificate proceeding or any legal proceeding.
The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below on submission of 20% of the due amount through bank draft within six months in favour of Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies, Corporation Ltd., Patna. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/- U T