← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18772/2022bail granted

Galibwasi @ Md. Galibwasi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-28Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18772 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-912 Year-2020 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== GALIBWASI @ MD. GALIBWASI S/o Md. Safique Anjum R/o villagePurwari Jhirwa, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Forbesganj (Simraha), District- Araria ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Forbesganj (Simraha) P.S. Case No. 912 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 50 bottles of cough syrup is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 30 bottles of cough syrup is recovered from the scooty whereas 20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18772 of 2022(2) dt.28-04-2022 2/2 bottles of cough syrup is recovered from the motorcycle. The petitioner is said to be owner of the scooty, in question. The said scooty was given by the petitioner to the co-villager for his personal use. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13-04-2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Cr. Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari vs State of Bihar). On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Court No. 1, Araria in connection with Forbesganj (Simraha) P.S. Case No. 912 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T