Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57609/2017bail granted

Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-11Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57609 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram, S/o Surendra Ram, resident of VillageBajeetpur, P.S. Maner, District- Patna, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Baby Devi D/o Rajendra Ram, W/o Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram, resident of Village- Barah, P.S. Rani Talab, District- Patna, Bihar. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sayed Imran Ghani, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 19.09.2017 in a case for the offence registered under Section 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57609 of 2017 (2) dt.11-12-2017 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 185 (C) of 2016. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T