Ashok Ray @ Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20095 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2018 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.
ASHOK RAY @ ASHOK KUMAR Son of Ramchandra Ray, Resident of Village-Morsandi, P.S-Motipur, District-Muzaffarpur. 2.
Ramayan Ray Son of Ramchandra Ray, Resident of Village-Morsandi, P.SMotipur, District-Muzaffarpur. 3.
Sanjeet Kumar Son of Ramchandra Ray, Resident of Village-Morsandi, P.SMotipur, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 427, 379 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 546 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. There is no specific accusation against the petitioners. The injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Motipur P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20095 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 No. 546 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.s ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitionerx shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T