Pankaj Kumar @ Raju Sahani @ Pankaj Sahani v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.634 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar @ Raju Sahani @ Pankaj Sahani Son of Sita Ram Sahani @ Siya Ram Sahani Resident of Jaughatta, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government Bihar, Patna Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna Patna 3.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga Darbhanga 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga Darbhanga 5.

The Investigating Officer (I.O.), Police Station Bahera, Darbhanga Darbhanga 6.

The Head Master UP Graded Middle School, Hariharpur Tardih, Darbhanga Darbhanga 7.

Maya Devi Wife of Laltun Sharma Resident of Vill- Jaughatta, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga 8.

Priyanka Kumari D/o- Laltun Sharma, R/v- Jaughatta, P.S.- Bahera, DistDarbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Madhumala Kumari, Advocate Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG For the Informant :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI) 01-05-2025 Heard Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned AC to AG for the State-Respondents and Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.634 of 2025(3) dt.01-05-2025 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a view to file appropriate proceeding before the appropriate forum.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that we have not examined the case of the petitioner on merits.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J.) (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) Sanjay/- U