Pintu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 24709 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Pintu Singh Son of Upendra Singh Resident of Village- Garha @ Gadha, P.S.- Patepur, Dist.- Vaishali, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 467, 414, 120B of the IPC and Sections 30 (a), 32 (1) (2), 36, 41

(2) (1) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 6320.520 liters of foreign liquor from a truck. It is next submitted that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot and, as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he is not the owner nor the driver of the seized truck. It is also submitted that the petitioner came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24709 of 2024(2) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 someone and police falsely implicated the petitioner when petitioner, admittedly, is a person with clean antecedent. 4 Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahua PS Case No 69 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr P C.

6 It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has even one antecedent, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect. (Satyavrat Verma, J) M.E.H./- U T