← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56823/2017bail granted

Jattu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-07Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56823 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -232 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Jattu Kumar Son of Sri Suresh Singh @ Suresh Sharma Resident of Village - Hadaspura, Police Station - Naubatpur, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 26.09.2016, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 232 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2494 of 2016 having earlier been rejected by order dated 19.09.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31998 of 2016.

3. It is submitted that while the earlier bail petition was rejected, however, liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge which has since been done on 12.10.2017 (Annexure-4).

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge VII, Danapur, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No.

corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2494 of 2016, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56823 of 2017 (2) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar/BT U T