Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56602/2018bail granted

Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-06Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56602 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2017 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar S/o Rajeshwar Ram, resident of Village- Lakhnauri, P.S. Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 141 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 387 of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of the U.A.P. Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of being member of Communist Party of India (Maowadi) and demanding Rs. 10 Lacs from the Informant. FIR is against unknown. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 03.01.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56602 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 141 of 2017, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U