Patna High CourtCWJC/10769/2015withdrawn

Dayashankar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-25The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10769 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Dayashankar Prasad, son of Late Yamuna Prasad, resident of village+P.O.+P.S.- Rajepur, Block-Mehsi, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director General of Police Vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Commissioner of Tirhut division, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Magistrate of East Champaran.

5. The S.P. of East Champaran District, Bihar.

6. The S.P. of Vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

7. The Investing officer of vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

8. Vakil Akhtar, Panchayat secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj Rajepur, P.SRajepur, Block- Mehsi, District- East Champaran.

9. Gulam Sarwar Ansari, at that relevant time Block development officer cum circle officer, Block- Mehsi, District- East Champaran.

10. Ravindra Kumar Singh, at that relevant time Junior Engineer, BlockMehsi, East Champaran.

11. Smt. Manju Devi, Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Rajepur, P.S.- Rajepur, Block- Mehsi, East Champaran.

12. Bhagwan Sah, son of late Dharkhan Sah, (husband of Mukhiya Manju Devi) resident of village+P.O.+P.S.- Rajepur, District- East Champaran. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Aag - 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 25-04-2016 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No. 6, appearing for the State respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioner to take

Patna High Court CWJC No.10769 of 2015 (2) dt.25-04-2016 recourse to appropriate provisions of law as may be permissible. To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) A.I./- U