← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29301/2025allowed

Shoman Kumar @ Shoman Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29301 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2024 Thana- SAMSTIPUR RAIL P.S DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Shoman Kumar @ Shoman Ram Son of Akhilesh Ram R/o Chhoti Jhiktiya, Ward No.- 06, P.O. and P.S.- Maheshkhunt, District - Khagaria, State - Bihar, 851213.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brajesh Sahay, Advocate Mr.Abhigyan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard Mr. Brajesh Sahay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anant Kumar 1, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with FIR No.272 of 2024, Samastipur GRP Rail P.S. of district Rail Muzaffarpur registered for the offence punishable under Section 305(c) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant was travelling by train as he elited Samastipur Station that he found certain valuable jewelries were missing from a bag. FIR was lodged against unknown persons. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the name of this petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of suspicion and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29301 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 nothing has been recovered from his possession.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.12.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Samastipur in connection with FIR No.272 of 2024, Samastipur GRP Rail P.S. of district Rail Muzaffarpur.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Saurav/- U T