Ram Avtar Das v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55841 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -88 Year- 2016 Thana -LAUKHI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Ram Avtar Das, S/o Jai Kishun Das, R/o Village- Mansapur, P.S.- Laukahi, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Premi Devi S/o Ram Avtar Das, R/o Village- Manaspur, P.S.- Laukahi, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dileep Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Laukahi P.S.Case No. 88 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 498A, 494 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing cruelty and also assaulting the informant, who is said to be his wife. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier also she had lodged same type of case and he is in custody for six months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55841 of 2017 (2) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 circumstances of the case, let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in connection with Laukhi P.S.Case No. 88 of 2016, subject to the following conditions :- (1) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned, (2) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and appear on each and every date in court, except showing any genuine reason, failing which his bail bond shall be cancelled.

If an application for maintenance is filed by his wife, he will co-operate in disposal of the same, otherwise informant shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U