Narayan Prasad Ambast And ANR v. Shri T.N.Lal Das And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3541 of 1998 ====================================================== 1.

Narayan Prasad Ambast, Son of Late Haldhar Prasad, resident of Village- Priya Nagar, P.S.- Salkhua, District- Saharsa, at present Asst. Teacher, Nationalized Prathmik Vidyalaya, Bishanpur Anchal, Mahisi, District- Saharsa.

2.

Satya Narayan Yadav, son of Devi Dayal Yadav, resident of VillageNandlali, P.S. Bihra, District- Saharsa, at present Asst. Teacher, Nationalized Middle School, Mahespur, P.S. Saur Bazar, DistrictSaharsa, .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Shri T. N. Lal Das, son of name not known to the petitioner, District Magistrat-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Saharsa.

2.

Sri Rajib Ranjan Prasad, son of name not known to the petitioners, District Superintendent of Education- Saharsa. 3.

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tara Nath Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.S. P. Yadav, SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 05-09-2017 Inter alia contending that an order passed on 16.03.1994 in C.W.J.C. No. 7194 of 1993 and C.W.J.C. No. 7195 of 1993 has not been complied with, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt.

From the year 1998, more than 18 years have passed and till date no action has been taken in the matter. Now the respondents, who are responsible for taking action in the matter, would no more be alive or available in the office.

Patna High Court MJC No.3541 of 1998 (4) dt.05-09-2017 2/2 Keeping in view the aforesaid, we direct that if the petitioners have any grievance, liberty shall be available to them to ventilate the claim in accordance with law and seek implementation of the order.

With the aforesaid, we find that no case is made out for initiating contempt.

This application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U