Sheikh Rustam @ Seikh Rushtam Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20208 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2021 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== SHEIKH RUSTAM @ SEIKH RUSHTAM ALI SON OF SHEIKH KADIR @ KADIR SHEKH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PIPRA DIULIYA, WARD NO.-35, P.O. - NARKATIYAGANJ, P.S. - SHIKARPUR, DISTT. - WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.

REHANA PARWEEN W/O SHEIKH RUSTAM @ SHEIKH RUSTAM ALI D/O LATE FARUKH AJAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DIULIYA, P.O. - NARKATIYAGANJ, P.S. - SHIKARPUR, DISTT. - WEST CHAMPARAN. AT PRESENT R/O VILLAGE - MURAD TOLA, ARYANAGAR, WARD NO. 21, P.S. - RAMNAGAR, DISTT. - WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sucheta Yadav Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 and learned APP for the State. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 498A of the IPC. 3.

Petitioner, who is husband of complainant, is said to have tortured the complainant over dowry demand and solemnized second marriage.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20208 of 2023(6) dt.08-05-2024 2/3 drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.

5.

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.340 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6.

Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.3000.00 (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to the complainant in the second week of every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, complainant shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

7.

It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20208 of 2023(6) dt.08-05-2024 3/3 case or any other collateral proceedings.

8.

Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 is directed to furnish the bank account details of the complainant before the learned Court below. If she fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the complainant after she furnishes her bank account details.

9.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

10.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T