Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55087/2018bail granted

Bindeshwari Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55087 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2016 Thana -KOPA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Bindeshwari Rai Son of late Ramayan Rai R/o Village - Dewaria Tola, Ujiar Das, P.S. Kopa, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kopa P.S.ase No.154 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the FIR the petitioner is said to be the order giver and the allegation of assault is against the other accused person. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody since 3.0.5.2018 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55087 of 2018 (2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM IVth,Saran at Chapra in connection with Kopa P.S.case No.154 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T